Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B)

$ 13.50

4.5 (252) In stock

Download scientific diagram | Continuously expandable interbody spacer in (A) minimized and (B) expanded forms (RISE-L Globus Medical, Inc, Audubon, PA). from publication: Comparative Effectiveness of Expandable Versus Static Interbody Spacers via MIS LLIF: A 2-Year Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Study | Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of expandable interbody spacers to static interbody spacers. Methods This is a retrospective, institutional review board–exempt chart review of | Static, Mullerian Inhibiting Substance (MIS) and Outcome Assessment (Health Care) | ResearchGate, the professional network for scientists.

Early Radiological Assessment of Static and Expandable Cages in Lateral Single Position for Indirect Decompression- Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion - ScienceDirect

Modèle Caring-PPH appliqué en soins de réadaptation © (St-Germain

Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic and open posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of single-segmental lumbar degenerative diseases, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Long-term radiographic outcomes of expandable versus static cages in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine Volume 34 Issue 3 (2020) Journals

Range of motion evaluation from the templating procedure is typically

Instrumentation choice and early radiographic outcome following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF): Lateral instrumentation versus posterior pedicle screw fixation - North American Spine Society Journal (NASSJ)

Prosthesis, Free Full-Text

Brain Sciences, Free Full-Text

Early Radiological Assessment of Static and Expandable Cages in Lateral Single Position for Indirect Decompression- Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion - ScienceDirect

FlareHawk7 – Accelus

Minimally Invasive Spinous Process Fixation and Fusion

Comparative Effectiveness of Adjustable Lordotic Expandable versus Static Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Comparative Effectiveness of Adjustable Lordotic Expandable versus Static Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices: One Year Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Related products

12mm spacer for LED size 3mm(T-1) & 5mm(T-1 3/4) [6452] : Sunrom Electronics

Throttle Body Spacer for Mitsubishi Pajero Mini H51/56A H53/58A

Minimizing shrinkage of acute brain slices using metal spacers

Palette Life Sciences Announces FDA 510(k) Clearance for Barrigel® Rectal Spacer, Proven Safe and Effective at Minimizing the Harmful Long-Term Side Effects of Prostate Radiation Therapy - Palette Life Sciences

20mm spacer for LED size 3mm(T-1) & 5mm(T-1 3/4) [4357] : Sunrom Electronics