PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

$ 17.99

4.5 (168) In stock

Mulligan bypass arch group provided a more controlled and faster tooth movement when compared to active laceback ligature, mainly attributed to the arch wire material and type of force. Objective: To compare the efficiency and effectiveness of Active laceback ligatures with that of Mulligan bypass arch for the amount of retraction, tipping and rotation. Materials and Methods: 20 patients were selected for the study who required upper 1 st premolar extraction for decrowding. All patients were treated with 3M Gemini - MBT 0.022” metal brackets. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 10 patientsin each group. Group 1 was treated with active laceback ligature and group 2 with Mulligan bypass arch. Changes were measured on the cast with a digital vernier caliper. Student ‘t’test was used to determine the mean differences between the two groups for the amount of retraction, tipping and rotation. Results: Significant distal movement of Canine occurred in both the groups. Movement of canine was more in group 2 but distal tipping of canine and distopalatal rotation of the molar was more in group 1. These differences were mainly attributed to the arch wire material and type of force. Conclusion: Mulligan bypass arch group provided a more controlled and faster tooth movement when compared to active laceback ligature.

PDF] Effectiveness of laceback ligatures on maxillary canine retraction.

T-loop spring vs ricketts maxillary canine retractor in canine retraction efficacy and anchorage loss control: A cone-beam computed tomography study - ScienceDirect

PDF) Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

AMREP_Research_Report_2009.pdf - Alfred Hospital

Evaluation of canine retraction following periodontal distraction using NiTi coil spring and implants – A clinical study - ScienceDirect

T-loop spring vs ricketts maxillary canine retractor in canine retraction efficacy and anchorage loss control: A cone-beam computed tomography study - ScienceDirect

Haematologica, Volume 105, Issue 11 by Haematologica - Issuu

PDF] Individual canine retraction: RCT comparing Mulligan bypasses

Medical and Surgical Management of Issues of Male Health (Section 5) - Men's Reproductive and Sexual Health Throughout the Lifespan

PDF) The Impact of Canine Retraction on Anchorage Loss in Two Methods of Active Lace Back and NiTi Closed Coil Spring

Haematologica, Volume 105, Issue 11 by Haematologica - Issuu

Related products

Long-Tie, Under-Tie or Tie-Back Ligature Tie for Max Anchorage

SPEED System Orthodontics

Full article: The effectiveness of laceback ligatures: A

JCDR - Alignment, Canine lacebacks, Incisor crowding, Open coil springs, Sliding mechanics

Chapter 1: Low-friction esthetic brackets: The Clarity™ SL Self-Ligating Appliance System